Actual pricing depends on your specific product, revenue, and coverage limits — these figures are reported ranges meant to help you sanity-check a quote, not a guarantee of what you'll pay. See Business Insurance for Ecommerce Sellers for what coverage you actually need before worrying about price.
The realistic range
Based on figures reported for coverage obtained through Amazon's own Insurance Accelerator network — a reasonable benchmark since it reflects real quotes from established carriers rather than marketing copy — ecommerce product liability coverage typically runs 0.25% to 1% of annual revenue, commonly landing around $500 to $2,000 per year for a typical small-to-mid-size seller. A seller doing $50,000/year in a low-risk category might pay toward the low end of that range; a seller doing $500,000/year in a higher-risk category could be well above it.
What actually moves the price
- Product category risk. This is the single biggest factor. A basic accessory, apparel item, or home-decor product generally insures far more cheaply than anything ingested, applied to skin, used by children, or carrying fire/electrical/combustion risk (supplements, cosmetics, children's toys, lithium-battery products). If your category is one of Amazon's newly designated "enhanced safety" categories (see Amazon's November 2026 Insurance Rule Change), expect pricing toward the higher end of the range, reflecting the same risk profile that drove the stricter requirement in the first place.
- Revenue and sales volume. Higher volume generally means higher expected claim exposure, which is priced in — this is part of why the cost is often expressed as a percentage of revenue rather than a flat fee.
- Coverage limits and deductible. A policy at the marketplace-minimum limit (commonly $1,000,000) costs less than a higher limit; a higher deductible generally lowers the premium in exchange for more out-of-pocket exposure on a claim.
- Claims history. An existing policyholder with no claims history typically renews at a more favorable rate than a new applicant in a higher-risk category with no track record yet.
- Bundling. Many sellers get general liability and product liability together through a Business Owner's Policy (BOP), which bundles liability with property coverage and sometimes costs less combined than purchasing each separately — confirm with your broker whether product liability is included in a given BOP quote or needs to be added.
A worked example
Two hypothetical sellers, both doing roughly $120,000/year in revenue:
- Seller A sells silicone kitchen utensils (low injury/health risk). At the lower end of the typical range (~0.25–0.4% of revenue), a reasonable premium estimate lands around $300–$480/year.
- Seller B sells a children's bath product (higher injury/health risk, in one of Amazon's enhanced-safety categories). At the higher end of the range (~0.8–1%+ of revenue, and potentially above it given the elevated category risk), a reasonable premium estimate lands around $960–$1,200+/year, and could run higher depending on the specific carrier's underwriting.
These are illustrative, not quotes — get actual numbers from a carrier before budgeting around either figure.
Where to actually get a number
Carriers don't generally publish fixed rate cards for this category of insurance, since pricing is underwritten per application. The fastest way to get a real number is a direct online quote — see Hiscox vs. NEXT Insurance for Ecommerce Sellers for two carriers (both part of Amazon's own Insurance Accelerator network) that offer fast, fully-online quotes without requiring a phone call first.
Common mistakes
- Budgeting around a single reported average without accounting for your specific category's risk profile — a supplement seller and an apparel seller shouldn't expect the same premium at the same revenue level.
- Assuming a bundled BOP automatically includes product liability — some don't by default, and finding this out after a claim rather than before is a far worse way to learn it.
- Treating the marketplace-minimum coverage limit as the ceiling of what you should carry, rather than sizing coverage to your actual risk exposure, which can reasonably be higher than the minimum for a higher-risk category.